{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"PHR Legal | Posse Herrera Ruiz","provider_url":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL COURT RULING - PHR Legal | Posse Herrera Ruiz","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"itkmlS2ZJc\"><a href=\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/novelties-en\/constitutional-court-ruling\/\">CONSTITUTIONAL COURT RULING<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/novelties-en\/constitutional-court-ruling\/embed\/#?secret=itkmlS2ZJc\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;CONSTITUTIONAL COURT RULING&#8221; &#8212; PHR Legal | Posse Herrera Ruiz\" data-secret=\"itkmlS2ZJc\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/TAX-Destacada.jpg","thumbnail_width":690,"thumbnail_height":440,"description":"THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT UPHELD THAT THE TAXABLE BASE OF THE CREE TAX MUST INCLUDE THE POSSIBILITY TO OFFSET TAX LOSSES AGAINST INCOME OF THE FOLLOWING YEARS  The Constitutional Court ruled on the challenge to Section 22 of Law 1607, which established the Income Tax for Equality (CREE)"}