{"id":7769,"date":"2017-05-18T19:49:43","date_gmt":"2017-05-19T00:49:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/phrdev.pixelpro.website\/novedades\/ruling-of-the-supreme-court-on-administrative-matters-5\/"},"modified":"2020-10-23T16:47:42","modified_gmt":"2020-10-23T21:47:42","slug":"ruling-of-the-supreme-court-on-administrative-matters-5","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/novelties-en\/ruling-of-the-supreme-court-on-administrative-matters-5\/","title":{"rendered":"RULING OF THE SUPREME COURT ON ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>RULING OF THE SUPREME COURT ON ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court on Administrative Matters suspends DIAN revenue rulings in connection with the tax treatment of compensations paid to sellers of multi-level marketing companies <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Remuneration of independent sellers is deductible, and multi-level companies are not obliged to verify the affiliation and payment of social security contributions <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Through its ruling No. 22518 of December 15<sup>th<\/sup> 2016, the Fourth Section of the Supreme Court on Administrative Matters provisionally suspended DIAN Revenue Rulings No. 8166 of March 16<sup>th<\/sup> 2015 and No. 31713 of November 4<sup>th<\/sup> 2015.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">These revenue rulings held that sellers hired by multi-level companies should be considered as <u>independent workers<\/u>. Under this understanding, multi-level companies were obliged to verify the affiliation and payment of social security, as a pre-requisite to be able to request the payment as deductible expenses in the income tax return of the company.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Supreme Court considered that this interpretation neglected the nature of the contractual relationship between multi-level companies and their sellers. Such sellers, according to Law 1700 of 2013, are qualified as \u201cindependent sellers\u201d. Therefore, the economic consideration that they are paid doesn\u2019t have the nature of a salary, but of an \u201ceconomic consideration\u201d for tax purposes.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In this line, the Supreme Court on Administrative Matters established that for the deductibility of the expense, it is not required that the multi-level company proves the affiliation and payment of social security contributions by its sellers.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court on Administrative Matters suspends DIAN revenue rulings in connection with the tax treatment of compensations paid to sellers of multi-level marketing companies<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":7273,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"default","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"default","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"default","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7769","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-novedades-categoria"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>RULING OF THE SUPREME COURT ON ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS - PHR Legal | Posse Herrera Ruiz<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/novelties-en\/ruling-of-the-supreme-court-on-administrative-matters-5\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"RULING OF THE SUPREME COURT ON ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS - PHR Legal | Posse Herrera Ruiz\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court on Administrative Matters suspends DIAN revenue rulings in connection with the tax treatment of compensations paid to sellers of multi-level marketing companies\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/novelties-en\/ruling-of-the-supreme-court-on-administrative-matters-5\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"PHR Legal | Posse Herrera Ruiz\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-05-19T00:49:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-10-23T21:47:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/TAX-Destacada.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"690\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"440\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor Pixelpro\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/novelties-en\/ruling-of-the-supreme-court-on-administrative-matters-5\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/novelties-en\/ruling-of-the-supreme-court-on-administrative-matters-5\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Editor Pixelpro\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/c1aec2a5e55d060bf5a5362878b7133c\"},\"headline\":\"RULING OF THE SUPREME COURT ON ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-05-19T00:49:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-10-23T21:47:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/novelties-en\/ruling-of-the-supreme-court-on-administrative-matters-5\/\"},\"wordCount\":238,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/novelties-en\/ruling-of-the-supreme-court-on-administrative-matters-5\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/TAX-Destacada.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Noticias\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/novelties-en\/ruling-of-the-supreme-court-on-administrative-matters-5\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/novelties-en\/ruling-of-the-supreme-court-on-administrative-matters-5\/\",\"name\":\"RULING OF THE SUPREME COURT ON ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS - PHR Legal | Posse Herrera Ruiz\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/novelties-en\/ruling-of-the-supreme-court-on-administrative-matters-5\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/novelties-en\/ruling-of-the-supreme-court-on-administrative-matters-5\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/TAX-Destacada.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-05-19T00:49:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-10-23T21:47:42+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/novelties-en\/ruling-of-the-supreme-court-on-administrative-matters-5\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/novelties-en\/ruling-of-the-supreme-court-on-administrative-matters-5\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/novelties-en\/ruling-of-the-supreme-court-on-administrative-matters-5\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/TAX-Destacada.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/TAX-Destacada.jpg\",\"width\":690,\"height\":440},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/novelties-en\/ruling-of-the-supreme-court-on-administrative-matters-5\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Portada\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"RULING OF THE SUPREME COURT ON ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/\",\"name\":\"PHR Legal | Posse Herrera Ruiz\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/#organization\",\"name\":\"POSSE HERRERA RUIZ\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/logo.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/logo.svg\",\"width\":1,\"height\":1,\"caption\":\"POSSE HERRERA RUIZ\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/c1aec2a5e55d060bf5a5362878b7133c\",\"name\":\"Editor Pixelpro\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/d2ace311142d851b7d46b774f2e23d25.jpg?ver=1774974510\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/d2ace311142d851b7d46b774f2e23d25.jpg?ver=1774974510\",\"caption\":\"Editor Pixelpro\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/pixelpro.com.co\/\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"RULING OF THE SUPREME COURT ON ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS - PHR Legal | Posse Herrera Ruiz","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/novelties-en\/ruling-of-the-supreme-court-on-administrative-matters-5\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"RULING OF THE SUPREME COURT ON ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS - PHR Legal | Posse Herrera Ruiz","og_description":"Supreme Court on Administrative Matters suspends DIAN revenue rulings in connection with the tax treatment of compensations paid to sellers of multi-level marketing companies","og_url":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/novelties-en\/ruling-of-the-supreme-court-on-administrative-matters-5\/","og_site_name":"PHR Legal | Posse Herrera Ruiz","article_published_time":"2017-05-19T00:49:43+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-10-23T21:47:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":690,"height":440,"url":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/TAX-Destacada.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor Pixelpro","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/novelties-en\/ruling-of-the-supreme-court-on-administrative-matters-5\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/novelties-en\/ruling-of-the-supreme-court-on-administrative-matters-5\/"},"author":{"name":"Editor Pixelpro","@id":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/c1aec2a5e55d060bf5a5362878b7133c"},"headline":"RULING OF THE SUPREME COURT ON ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS","datePublished":"2017-05-19T00:49:43+00:00","dateModified":"2020-10-23T21:47:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/novelties-en\/ruling-of-the-supreme-court-on-administrative-matters-5\/"},"wordCount":238,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/novelties-en\/ruling-of-the-supreme-court-on-administrative-matters-5\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/TAX-Destacada.jpg","articleSection":["Noticias"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/novelties-en\/ruling-of-the-supreme-court-on-administrative-matters-5\/","url":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/novelties-en\/ruling-of-the-supreme-court-on-administrative-matters-5\/","name":"RULING OF THE SUPREME COURT ON ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS - PHR Legal | Posse Herrera Ruiz","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/novelties-en\/ruling-of-the-supreme-court-on-administrative-matters-5\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/novelties-en\/ruling-of-the-supreme-court-on-administrative-matters-5\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/TAX-Destacada.jpg","datePublished":"2017-05-19T00:49:43+00:00","dateModified":"2020-10-23T21:47:42+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/novelties-en\/ruling-of-the-supreme-court-on-administrative-matters-5\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/novelties-en\/ruling-of-the-supreme-court-on-administrative-matters-5\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/novelties-en\/ruling-of-the-supreme-court-on-administrative-matters-5\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/TAX-Destacada.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/TAX-Destacada.jpg","width":690,"height":440},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/novelties-en\/ruling-of-the-supreme-court-on-administrative-matters-5\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Portada","item":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"RULING OF THE SUPREME COURT ON ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/","name":"PHR Legal | Posse Herrera Ruiz","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/#organization","name":"POSSE HERRERA RUIZ","url":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/logo.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/logo.svg","width":1,"height":1,"caption":"POSSE HERRERA RUIZ"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/c1aec2a5e55d060bf5a5362878b7133c","name":"Editor Pixelpro","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/d2ace311142d851b7d46b774f2e23d25.jpg?ver=1774974510","contentUrl":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/d2ace311142d851b7d46b774f2e23d25.jpg?ver=1774974510","caption":"Editor Pixelpro"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/pixelpro.com.co\/"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7769","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7769"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7769\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7273"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7769"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7769"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/phrlegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7769"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}